Legal Minute

Welcome to the PilieroMazza blog, featuring trending legal insight in the areas of government contracting, general business and corporate issues, labor and employment, and civil litigation matters.


New CVE Guidance on Joint Ventures and Mentor-Protégé Relationships

By Peter Ford

Earlier this month, the VA’s Center for Verification and Evaluation (“CVE”) published a new VA Verification Assistance Brief, Understanding Joint Venture and Mentor-Protégé Agreement Eligibility (“Assistance Brief”). The Assistance Brief explains the criteria that make a joint venture (“JV”) eligible for verification and inclusion in the VA VetBiz Vendor Information Pages (“VIP”) database, which is helpful given that the VA’s regulations, specifically 38 C.F.R. Part 74, say very little in terms of how a JV can be verified by CVE as an eligible veteran-owned or service-disabled-veteran-owned small business (“VOSB” or “SDVOSB”). Nevertheless, VOSBs and SDVOSBs interested in forming JVs to pursue set-aside work with the VA must not treat the new CVE guidance as gospel because the Assistance Brief, while informative, cites outdated SBA regulations and, at the same time, raises questions about how the VA’s own regulations should be interpreted.

If you are wondering why a VA Verification Assistance Brief on JVs would reference SBA rules in the first place, the answer is two-fold:  for a JV to be considered a VOSB or SDVOSB for VA set-aside work, (1) the JV must qualify as a small business under the SBA’s size rules for SDVOSB JVs; and (2) the parties’ joint venture agreement (“JVA”) must contain the 12 provisions required by the SBA’s regulations on SDVOSB JVs. And, in this regard, the Assistance Brief is a valuable resource (with one exception discussed below), as it cites the full text of each provision that must be set forth in the JVA. Moreover, the Assistance Brief explains that a JV between a verified SDVOSB or VOSB and a large business can qualify as small, provided the parties have a Mentor-Protégé Agreement (“MPA”) approved by the SBA. In other words, the Assistance Brief confirms that the VA will recognize the exemption from affiliation available to JVs formed under the umbrella of an SBA-approved MPA.

Still, VOSBs and SDVOSBs should be cautioned that the VA/CVE is mistaken with respect to how JV profits should be split. According to the Assistance Brief, the JVA has to contain a provision stating that the VOSB or SDVOSB partner will receive profits from the JV commensurate with its ownership interest in the JV. However, in December of last year, the SBA made a technical correction to its SDVOSB JV regulations to clarify that the JVA shall state that the SDVOSB partner must receive profits from the JV commensurate with the work performed by the SDVOSB. Notably, the Assistance Brief also states that a JV may be in the form of a partnership. While the SBA’s rules on JVs make clear that a JV can have a formal structure (e.g., an LLC) or an informal structure (e.g., a partnership), a JV—as defined under the VA’s regulations—must be in the form of a separate legal entity, which suggests you cannot form a JV as a partnership to pursue VA work.   

In closing, the Assistance Brief sheds additional light on how a JV can be verified by CVE and included in the VIP database. Thus, if you are looking to form a JV to pursue VA set-aside work, you should review the Assistance Brief—but for informational purposes only. As the disclaimer in the Assistance Brief appropriately warns, the information provided may not be accurate or up-to-date and, as such, you need to review the applicable regulations and/or seek counsel with expertise in this area.

About the author: Peter Ford is a partner with PilieroMazza in the Government Contracts Group. He may be reached at      

Sign up for our blog, the PM Legal Minute,
our quarterly and weekly newsletters,
or our seminar and webinar accouncements.

Disclaimer:  The content of this blog is intended for informational purposes only. Information in this blog is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate or updated. It is not intended to solicit business or to provide legal advice. Laws differ by jurisdiction, and the information on this blog may not apply to every reader. You should not take, or refrain from taking, any legal action based upon the information contained on this blog without first seeking professional counsel. Your use of the blog does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and PilieroMazza PLLC. We reserve the right to rescind or remove without notice any of the site’s content and the site is not guaranteed to be continuously accessible. Opinions expressed in posts (or other publications) by one or more individual members of the Firm are not be taken as those of the Firm or any of the clients of the Firm.  The Firm does not intend or purport to practice in any jurisdiction other than those in which its lawyers are authorized to practice. Clip art © Can Stock Photo Inc.
The U.S. Department of Transportation (“DOT”) Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (“DBE”) Program provides opportunities for small
Earlier this month, the VA’s Center for Verification and Evaluation (“CVE”) published a new VA
The Department of Transportation’s (“DOT”) Disadvantage Business Enterprise (“DBE”) program is not as well-known as
In November of last year, I prepared a blog article about a specific clause that
In a recently published GAO decision, GAO sustained a SDVOSB’s protest of its exclusion from