Legal Minute

Welcome to the PilieroMazza blog, featuring trending legal insight in the areas of government contracting, general business and corporate issues, labor and employment, and civil litigation matters.


Jun
16
2016

VA Required to put Veterans First in Kingdomware Supreme Court Decision

By Jon Williams

In a big win for veteran-owned small businesses, the Supreme Court today ruled unanimously in favor of Kingdomware Technologies, Inc., in its case against the Department of Veterans Affairs (“VA”).

Kingdomware had brought suit challenging the VA’s failure to set aside an order under the Federal Supply Schedule (“FSS”) for veteran-owned small businesses. In the ensuing litigation, the VA took the position that it was not required to reserve FSS orders for SDVOSBs or VOSBs because the mandates of the “Veterans First” law did not apply to FSS. While the VA was successful with its arguments before two lower courts, the Supreme Court disagreed.

In a fairly straight-forward ruling, the Supreme Court found that the Veterans First law did not contain any exceptions for FSS orders and, therefore, the requirement to give preference to SDVOSBs and VOSBs extends to FSS orders. The Supreme Court also rejected the VA’s argument that an order under the FSS is not a contract; the Court found such orders are clearly contracts. And, in overturning the lower-court’s analysis, the Supreme Court held that the required use of veterans' preferences applies to all VA acquisitions, and regardless of whether the VA has met its annual veteran contracting goals.

The case will now be remanded to the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court’s ruling.

About the Author: Jon Williams is a partner with PilieroMazza and a member of the Government Contracts Group. He may be reached at jwilliams@pilieromazza.com.
 



 
Sign up for our blog, the PM Legal Minute,
our quarterly and weekly newsletters,
or our seminar and webinar accouncements.

Disclaimer:  The content of this blog is intended for informational purposes only. Information in this blog is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate or updated. It is not intended to solicit business or to provide legal advice. Laws differ by jurisdiction, and the information on this blog may not apply to every reader. You should not take, or refrain from taking, any legal action based upon the information contained on this blog without first seeking professional counsel. Your use of the blog does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and PilieroMazza PLLC. We reserve the right to rescind or remove without notice any of the site’s content and the site is not guaranteed to be continuously accessible. Opinions expressed in posts (or other publications) by one or more individual members of the Firm are not be taken as those of the Firm or any of the clients of the Firm.  The Firm does not intend or purport to practice in any jurisdiction other than those in which its lawyers are authorized to practice. Clip art © Can Stock Photo Inc.
On March 8, 2017, GAO issued a report on government contracting trends from fiscal year
Imagine how you might react if an employee who agreed to keep your information confidential
You’ve probably heard that few cases that are filed in court actually are resolved by
​Government contractors concerned over the potential impact of President Obama’s 2014 Executive Order 13673 "Fair
Early last year, on January 26, 2016, SBA issued a new requirement that IT Value