Cy Alba Co-Hosts “The Real Deal” Podcast Series Highlighting Winning, Growing, and Exiting in Government Contracting

Powered by OrangeSlices’ “ The Peel ” podcast, “The Real Deal” is a new series created by PilieroMazza partner Cy Alba and Sarah Djamshidi of Speedshift Ventures. Episodes explore the fast-evolving world of M&A in the government contracting space. This series dives deep into the realities facing buyers, sellers, advisors, and operators—unpacking the trends, risks, and decisions behind successful (and sometimes failed) deals. In this premiere episode “Cybersecurity, Contracts, and Culture: De-risking Your Deal Before You Sell,” Cy and Sarah unravel the complex dynamics shaping . . . Read More

FAR Part 6 Rewrite: What It Means for Small Business Set-Asides, Socioeconomic Programs, and the Rule of Two

The recent rewrite of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 6—governing “Competition Requirements”—is prompting questions about whether the changes may signal a shift in federal small business contracting policy. In particular, the removal of explicit references to certain socioeconomic program provisions raises concerns in the small business community. In this blog, PilieroMazza dissects the FAR Part 6 rewrite, concluding that most revisions appear to be structural rather than substantive. However, the unresolved status of the “Rule of Two” continues to . . . Read More

Cybersecurity, AI, and EO 14306: What Government Contractors Must Do to Stay Compliant

In June 2025, President Trump signed Executive Order 14306 (EO), titled “Sustaining Select Efforts to Strengthen the Nation’s Cybersecurity and Amending Executive Order 13694 and Executive Order 14144,” which amends and supersedes portions of President Biden’s [1] and President Obama’s [2] executive orders on cybersecurity. The EO was accompanied by a Fact Sheet , which provides further reasoning for the revisions. Although the EO amends and supersedes portions of President Biden’s and President Obama’s executive orders, it generally leaves the framework established by these orders in place. . . . Read More

How the Boards of Contract Appeals Work—And Why It Matters for Your Bottom Line, Part 3

Generally, government contractors proceeding towards a Board of Contract Appeals (BCA) decision are wise to take the safe, traditional route. While it can be a long and winding road—engaging in pleadings, discovery, a hearing, and a decision—this process presents the least risk of getting lost. For risk-averse contractors whose priority is having their legal issues fully investigated, considered, and addressed by the BCAs, this is often the best strategy. However, in certain situations—e.g., when the parties urgently need the BCA’s . . . Read More

GSA MAS Refresh #27: Mandatory Transactional Data Reporting and Other Key Changes

On June 26, 2025, the General Services Administration (GSA) released MAS Refresh #27 —the latest GSA Multiple Award Schedule (MAS) solicitation update and mass modification. Among other changes, Refresh #27 significantly expands the use of Transactional Data Reporting (TDR), making it mandatory for contracts containing one of the 177 TDR-eligible Special Item Numbers (SINs). Further, GSA intends to make TDR mandatory for all MAS contracts in an upcoming refresh anticipated in Fiscal Year (FY) 2026. This move marks a major expansion of GSA’s . . . Read More

The CPAR Trap: What SLSCO Teaches Contractors About Challenging Performance Ratings

Contractor Performance Assessment Reports (CPARs) are a critical currency in the world of government contracting—shaping future awards, past‐performance evaluations, and a contractor’s reputation. Positive assessments can help contractors secure future work with the government, while even a single marginal or unsatisfactory rating can ripple across future procurements, damaging a contractor’s competitive standing for years. When a contractor receives a negative CPAR, it must act quickly to correct issues with the ratings and recommendations before government customers rely on the negative . . . Read More

Lawmakers Sound Alarm Over VA’s AI-Driven Contract Terminations: What to Do If You’re Terminated

The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is facing growing scrutiny from Congress after it abruptly canceled hundreds of contracts—many of which support critical services for veterans—based in part on recommendations from a hastily developed artificial intelligence (AI) tool. On June 13, 2025, Senators Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) and Angus King (I-ME), members of the Senate Committee on Veterans’ Affairs (Committee), sent a letter to Acting VA Inspector General David Case urging a formal investigation into the VA’s contract termination process. If . . . Read More

The Unusual Case of Obtaining a “Pause” on Performance After Missing the Filing Deadlines

One of the primary benefits of filing a protest with the Government Accountability Office (GAO) is that it automatically puts the awarded contracts on hold, stopping the agency from proceeding with performance. To reap the benefits of the automatic stay, however, the law requires protesters—in a post-award posture—to file their protests within ten days of contract award or five days after the close of a requested and required debriefing, as applicable. The time limits are tight, but the reward can . . . Read More

SVOG Grant Recipients Face Renewed Scrutiny: Understanding Your Appeal Rights When SBA Rescinds Prior Grant Approval

Recently, the Small Business Administration (SBA) began issuing letters to recipients of grant funds under the $16.25 Billion COVID-era Shuttered Venue Operators Grant (SVOG) program, rescinding grant recipients’ eligibility for the program and demanding full or partial repayment of the grants. In many cases, the notices were a shock to grant recipients who went through multiple rounds of the grant approval process and received audit approval for their use of grant funds. Now, they face a daunting 30-day deadline for repayment of hundreds of . . . Read More

New False Claims Act Threats: 5 Key Takeaways from DOJ’s Initiative Targeting DEI and Antisemitism

On May 19, 2025, the Department of Justice (DOJ) issued a memorandum launching a new enforcement program known as the Civil Rights Fraud Initiative (the Initiative). Furthering the Trump Administration’s direct targeting of diversity, equity, and inclusion ((DEI) policies and alleged antisemitism among corporations and institutions receiving government funds, the Initiative will utilize the False Claims Act (FCA) to “investigate and . . . pursue claims against any recipient of federal funds that knowingly violates federal civil rights laws.” As part of the Initiative, . . . Read More