Sam Finnerty and Cy Alba Discuss Procurement Overhaul with Bloomberg Government
Transparency into major system acquisitions by federal agencies could be a casualty of cuts to procurement regulations proposed by the agency council that coordinates how the government buys goods and services. Suggested deletions from the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) will make executive branch agencies more vulnerable to financial and litigation risk when purchasing goods and services from the private sector[. . .]. . . . The overhaul would strip out key references to policies and procedures detailing the use of . . . Read More
The Revolutionary FAR Overhaul: What Government Contractors Need to Know
On May 6, 2025, the Federal Acquisition Regulatory Council (FAR Council) published draft revisions to the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) as part of a sweeping, phased update known as the Revolutionary FAR Overhaul (RFO). The initial draft revisions—covering FAR Parts 1, 34, and 52—are now open for public comment through September 30, 2025, at 12:00 PM EST. However, in a major break from traditional practice, federal agencies are being directed to begin immediate adoption of the draft text through FAR deviations. This . . . Read More
OMB Issues Memoranda on Use and Acquisition of AI by Federal Agencies, Part 2: What It Means for Government Contractors
In Part 2 of this series, we look at OMB Memorandum M-25-22 , which addresses the procurement of AI by federal agencies. As noted in Part 1 , the memos implement Executive Order 14179, “Removing Barriers to American Leadership in Artificial Intelligence,” issued by President Trump on January 23, 2025, and rescinds and replaces prior OMB memos issued by President Biden’s administration addressing the same. Like M-25-21, M-25-22 marks a significant shift in how federal agencies acquire and integrate AI—highlighting what government contractors, . . . Read More
Weekly Update for Government Contractors and Commercial Businesses – May 1, 2025
If you have questions concerning the content below, please visit this link . Upcoming Events: Register to attend PilieroMazza’s upcoming events here . Recent Thought Leadership: Check out PilieroMazza’s recent client alerts and blogs here . Podcasts: Listen to PilieroMazza’s podcasts GovCon Live! here , Clocking in with PilieroMazza here , and Ex Rel. Radio here . GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS SWIFT to Launch May 1: DOD Fast Tracks Software Deployment Opening New Doors for Defense Contractors, PilieroMazza Blog, Samuel S. Finnerty In a decisive move to stay ahead in an era of rapidly evolving digital . . . Read More
Multijurisdictional Employers, Part 1: Independent Contractors vs. Employees, Classifications Under Federal and State Laws
Click here to view the recorded session. For employers managing a workforce across multiple jurisdictions, navigating the complexities of worker classification is essential to ensuring legal compliance and avoiding costly penalties. Whether you are dealing with independent contractors or employees, understanding the differences and meeting the legal standards of both federal and state law is crucial. This is the first in a series of webinars focused on topics relevant to “Multijurisdictional Employers.” Join PilieroMazza’s Nichole Atallah and Georgi Kokenis for an in-depth webinar as they explore the . . . Read More
SWIFT to Launch May 1: DOD Fast Tracks Software Deployment Opening New Doors for Defense Contractors
In a decisive move to stay ahead in an era of rapidly evolving digital threats, the Department of Defense (DOD) is accelerating its push for software modernization. The upcoming launch of the Software Fast Track (SWIFT) Program on May 1 marks a major step in the DOD’s efforts to streamline software deployment by addressing long-standing bottlenecks in the software authorization process. For defense contractors, SWIFT presents an opportunity to deliver mission-critical software to the DOD more rapidly, ensuring it reaches . . . Read More
OMB Issues Memoranda on Use and Acquisition of AI by Federal Agencies, Part 1: What It Means for Government Contractors
On April 3, 2025, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) issued two memoranda addressing the accelerated use and efficient acquisition of Artificial Intelligence (AI) by federal agencies: M-25-21 and M-25-22 . The memos implement Executive Order 14179, “Removing Barriers to American Leadership in Artificial Intelligence,” issued by President Trump on January 23, 2025. [1] This blog is the first in a two-part series discussing the first memo, M-25-21, which focuses on the use of AI by federal agencies, signaling a significant shift . . . Read More
The Rise of OTA in Defense Contracting, Part 3: Best Practices for OTA Negotiations
In this Part 3 of PilieroMazza’s blog series, “The Rise of OTA in Defense Contracting,” we discuss tactics and best practices defense contractors should deploy when negotiating terms once selected for an OT award. This is essential guidance to strengthen your position and protect your interests throughout the contract’s lifecycle. Visit this link to access Parts 1 and 2 in this blog series. Flexibility = Negotiation As discussed in the previous blog, the flexibility of DOD’s OTA is key to achieving . . . Read More
Managing Litigation Risk During the Business Lifecycle, Part 2: Business Acquisition and Post-Closing Disputes
There’s a tongue-in-cheek joke within the legal industry that transactional lawyers create the problems, and the litigators get paid to clean them up. It’s a cautionary reminder to transactional lawyers: if the dealmaking process is not precise (or well-documented), then the risk of post-closing litigation is increased. In this second installment of PilieroMazza’s blog series, “Managing Litigation Risk During the Business Lifecycle,” we explore how a company acquiring another company can minimize litigation risk by taking a methodical and thoughtful . . . Read More
Top 10 Killer Construction Contract Clauses, Part 1: No Damages for Delay
Those familiar with the construction industry know that construction projects are seldom, if ever, completed within the time originally anticipated at the project’s outset. Fortunately, prime contractors and lower-tier subcontractors are often permitted to seek additional costs stemming from owner-caused delays—commonly referred to as compensable delays. However, the presence of a no damages for delay clause in a contract can significantly impede a contractor’s and subcontractor’s ability to pursue claims for compensable delay. Because delays increase construction costs, construction contractors . . . Read More